Gropweb: sugar
News Update
Loading...
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات sugar. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات sugar. إظهار كافة الرسائل

الأحد، 27 فبراير 2022

Our next visits to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, & Neptune are incredibly important

Our next visits to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, & Neptune are incredibly important

 Our next visits to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, & Neptune are incredibly important

The giant planets – Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune – are some of the most awe-inspiring in our Solar System, and have great importance for space research and our comprehension of the greater universe.


Yet they remain the least explored – especially the “ice giants” Uranus and Neptune – due to their distance from Earth, and the extreme conditions spacecraft must survive to enter their atmospheres. As such, they’re also the least understood planets in the Solar System.


Our ongoing research looks at how to overcome the harsh entry conditions experienced during giant planet missions. As we look forward to potential future missions, here’s what we might expect.


Jupiter is about ten times as large as Earth – with a 69,911km radius (compared to Earth’s 6,371km radius). Beinahegut

Jupiter is about ten times as large as Earth – with a 69,911km radius (compared to Earth’s 6,371km radius). Beinahegut

But first, what are giant planets?

Ask Edward Snowden anything live during his talk!

Join us front row at TNW Conference 2022


Unlike rocky planets, giant planets don’t have a surface to land on. Even in their lower atmospheres, they remain gaseous, reaching extremely high pressures that would crush any spacecraft well before it could land on anything solid.


There are two types of giant planets: gas giants and ice giants.


The larger Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants. These are mainly made of hydrogen and helium, with an outer gaseous layer and a partially liquid “metallic” layer below that. They’re also believed to have a small rocky core.


Uranus and Neptune have similar outer atmospheres and rocky cores, but their inner layer is made up of about 65% water and other so-called “ices” (although these technically remain liquid) such as methane and ammonia.


Relative size and composition of the giant planets in our solar system (with Earth also shown for comparison). JPL/Caltech (based on material from the Lunar and Planetary Institute)

Relative size and composition of the giant planets in our solar system (with Earth also shown for comparison). JPL/Caltech (based on material from the Lunar and Planetary Institute)

Slingshots to the edge of the Solar System

Any giant planet mission is extremely difficult. Still, there have been some past missions sent to the gas giants.


NASA’s 1989 Galileo mission had to slingshot around Venus and Earth to give it enough momentum to get to Jupiter, which it orbited for eight years. The 2011 Juno mission spent five years in transit, using a flyby around Earth to reach Jupiter (which it still orbits).


Similarly, the Cassini-Huygens mission run by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) took seven years to reach Saturn. The spacecraft spent 13 years exploring the planet and its surroundings and launched a probe to explore Saturn’s moon, Titan.


Flight times get even longer for the two ice giants, which are much further from the Sun. Neither has had a dedicated mission so far.


A complex journey

The last and only spacecraft to visit the ice giants was Voyager 2, which flew by Uranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989.


Voyager 2, the only spacecraft ever to have visited Neptune, took a photo of the planet in 1989. NASA/JPL

Voyager 2, the only spacecraft ever to have visited Neptune, took a photo of the planet in 1989. NASA/JPL

While momentum is building for a return, it won’t be simple. If we launch during the next convenient launch windows of 2030–34 for Uranus and 2029–30 for Neptune, flight times would vary from 11 to 15 years.


A major issue is a power. The Juno spacecraft is the most distant object from the Sun to have used solar panels. It orbits Jupiter, which is five times further away from the Sun than Earth is. Yet, where Juno’s solar cells would generate 14 kilowatts of continuous power on Earth, they only generate 0.5kW at Jupiter.


Meanwhile, Uranus and Neptune are 20 and 30 times further away, respectively, from the Sun than Earth is. Power for these missions would have to be generated from the radioactive decay of plutonium (the power source for both the Galileo and Cassini missions).


This radioactive decay can damage and interfere with instruments. It is therefore reserved for spacecraft which need it, such as missions operating far away from the Sun.


Fighting the heat

The massive scale of giant planets means orbit speeds for incoming spacecraft are incredibly fast. And these speeds greatly heat the spacecraft.


The Galileo probe entered Jupiter’s atmosphere at 47.5 kilometers per second, surviving the harshest entry conditions ever experienced by an entry probe. The shock layer which formed at the front of the spacecraft during entry reached a temperature of 16,000℃ – around three times the temperature of the Sun’s surface.


Even so, the distribution of the heat shield’s mass was found to be inefficient – showing we still have a lot to learn about entering giant planets.


Proposed future probe missions to Uranus and Neptune would occur at slower entry speeds of 22km/s and 26km/s, respectively.


For this, NASA has developed a tough but relatively lightweight material woven from carbon fiber, called HEEET (Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology), designed specifically for surviving giant planet and Venusian entry.


While the material has been tested with a full-scale prototype, it has yet to fly on a mission.


It’s planned NASA’s HEEET material will be used for future ice giant entry missions. NASA

It’s planned NASA’s HEEET material will be used for future ice giant entry missions. NASA

The next steps

In 2024, NASA’s Europa Clipper mission will launch to investigate Jupiter’s moon Europa, which is believed to house an ocean of liquid water below its icy surface, where signs of life may be found. The Dragonfly mission, planned to launch in 2026, will similarly aim to search for signs of life on Saturn’s moon Titan.


There are plans for a joint NASA-ESA mission to visit one of the ice giants within the upcoming launch window. But while there has been extensive preparation, it’s undecided which ice giant will be visited.


A single mission to both planets is being considered. An entry probe is planned, too. But if the mission visits both planets, it’s undecided which planet’s atmosphere the probe would explore.


If we want to meet the upcoming launch window, its expected mission concepts will need to be finalized by 2025, at the latest. In other words, crunch time is coming.


Should a mission go forward, the two most important goals for NASA’s scientists will be to determine the interior makeup of ice giants (exactly what they are made of) and their composition (how they are formed).


Other objectives will include studying their magnetic fields, which are very different from gas giants and all other types of planets.


They’ll also want to study the heat released by both Uranus and Neptune, which both have average temperatures of around -200℃. All giant planets are meant to be very slowly cooling down, as they release energy gained during their formation.


This heat release can be detected for Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune. Uranus, however, doesn’t seem to release heat – and scientists don’t know why. The Conversation

Article by Chris James, ARC DECRA Fellow, Centre for Hypersonics, School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland and Yu Liu, Honorary Fellow, The University of Queensland


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Can we get sweat sensors in our fitness wearables already?

Can we get sweat sensors in our fitness wearables already?

 Can we get sweat sensors in our fitness wearables already?

Sweat is a biological fluid — like blood, saliva, and urine — that contains metabolites, electrolytes, proteins, and hormones. The levels of these vary depending on a person’s health. Wearable sweat sensors have been developed to track users’ health conditions and monitor the levels of these substances (known as analytes) in sweat.


Lactate is considered an important biomarker thanks to its involvement in anaerobic metabolism. The undesired accumulation of lactate in muscles can result in fatigue, so changes in the concentration of lactate in sweat can be used to monitor fatigue. At Simon Fraser University’s Additive Manufacturing Laboratory, we have developed a flexible sensor for sweat lactate.


The benefit of using wearable sweat sensors is the capability for real-time, non-invasive and continuous monitoring of sweat. However, there are still challenges that must be overcome for practical biomedical applications such as the diagnosis of health conditions.


Sweat challenges

Got plans this June?

Tickets to TNW 2022 are available now!


One of the first hurdles in developing a reliable sweat sensor is the difficulty of collecting and routing sweat. There are various methods for sampling sweat for sensing. One of the most representative approaches for collecting sweat is using microfluidic systems with channels that deliver sweat.


Absorbent materials like cloth can also be used for sweat sampling for sensing. However, sampling sweat takes time, and how to handle the sweat sample and supply it in the sensing region continuously and stably remains a challenge for real-time measurement through continuous sensing of freshly generated sweat.


One of the most recent demonstrations used an integrated microfluidic system with thermo-responsive hydrogels. This system demonstrated significant potential for programmable control of sweat routing and sensing, which will improve the sweat handling for future sweat sensors.


Secondly, there is no single representative analyte in sweat. Sweat sensors can detect analytes such as ammonia, ethanol, ions, glucose, lactate, sweat chloride, pH, urea, and creatinine, but there isn’t a single analyte that can independently provide a significant picture of an individual’s health. This means that sweat sensors must be able to measure many different substances in sweat to provide a useful report.


Several sweat sensor products are coming to market that measure analytes like the protein cytokine and glucose and lactate.


A third challenge is the reliability and accuracy of sweat sensors. If we measure the level of a target analyte from sweat, can we determine how reliable the result is in terms of judging the level of the same analyte in the subject’s blood?


We still need to determine the relationship between levels of analyte in sweat and blood, and the relationship between sweats from different parts of the body. This recent study demonstrated that sweat bio-sensing can provide blood-correlated ethanol concentration data, which gives us hope that it may be possible to find blood-correlated concentrations for other analytes as well.


People living with diseases like diabetes can benefit from non-invasive and real-time monitoring.

Credit: David Moruzzi / Unsplash

People living with diseases like diabetes can benefit from non-invasive and real-time monitoring. Image: David Moruzzi / Unsplash

Powerful solutions

Users can specifically monitor targeted analytes in real-time by non-invasive sweat sensing. This can save time, energy, and resources by helping people avoid painful and inconvenient invasive tests, improving health and living standards, and receiving medical assistance promptly.


Wearable sweat sensors are a powerful solution for monitoring daily health and could support the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of diseases. Technological applications may come earlier than we expected through close collaboration between clinical doctors, scientists, and engineers. The Conversation

This article by Woo Soo Kim, Associate Professor, Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, and Taeil Kim, Postdoctoral fellow, Applied Sciences, Simon Fraser University, is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Featured

[Featured][recentbylabel]

Featured

[Featured][recentbylabel]
Notification
This is just an example, you can fill it later with your own note.
Done